Head-to-Head: Games Played Between Joe Dumars and Jim Paxson

This is the detail of NBA games in which Joe Dumars and Jim Paxson played against each other, including head-to-head record, stats average, game highs and game-by-game data both in the Regular Season and Playoffs.

Player comparisons:
Career comparison / Season by season / Games against each other

They faced each other a total of 15 times in NBA games. Joe Dumars has an 8-7 winning record over Jim Paxson, including a 4-2 record in Playoffs.

Games Played Against Each Other

Joe Dumars
vs.
Jim Paxson
NBA Timeline:
1946-47
2023-24
Joe Dumars:
1985-86 to 1998-99
Jim Paxson:
1979-80 to 1989-90
15 Games played
9 in Regular Season
6 in Playoffs

Summary of Victories

 Games Won in
Regular Season		 in
Playoffs
Joe Dumars
8
4
4
Jim Paxson
7
5
2

Stats in Games Between Them

Averages
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Joe Dumars 13.8 1.9 5.6 0.90.1
Jim Paxson 5.9 1.7 1.70.90.0
Game Highs
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Joe Dumars 29 4 10 41
Jim Paxson 22 7 6 40
Games with better stats than the other player...
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Joe Dumars 12

games		 7

games		 14

games		 6

games		1

game
Jim Paxson 3

games 		6

games		 1

game		 6

games		0

games
Both had same stat 0

games		 2

games		 0

games		 3

games		14

games

Head To Head Games Played: One by One

more >>
1985-86 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Feb. 22, 1986
1. Pistons 113   Joe Dumars 13 2 6 0 0 3 2 28 5-8 .625 0-0 - 3-4 .750
Trail Blazers 106   Jim Paxson 14 7 3 4 0 3 6 27 6-14 .429 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
Mar. 16, 1986
2. Pistons 109   Joe Dumars 6 1 6 1 0 1 3 32 3-8 .375 0-0 - 0-2 .000
Trail Blazers 119   Jim Paxson 22 5 4 2 0 0 3 30 7-9 .778 1-1 1.000 7-7 1.000
1987-88 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Jan. 24, 1988
3. Pistons 111   Joe Dumars 8 0 4 1 0 4 1 25 4-8 .500 0-0 - 0-0 -
Trail Blazers 119   Jim Paxson 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 13 3-6 .500 0-0 - 0-0 -
Feb. 28, 1988
4. Pistons 106   Joe Dumars 16 2 10 0 0 3 2 42 7-14 .500 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
Celtics 101   Jim Paxson 7 0 3 1 0 2 1 14 3-5 .600 0-0 - 1-2 .500
Apr. 01, 1988
5. Pistons 110   Joe Dumars 12 2 3 4 0 1 2 33 3-8 .375 0-0 - 6-6 1.000
Celtics 121   Jim Paxson 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 06 0-2 .000 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
Apr. 19, 1988
6. Pistons 110   Joe Dumars 10 2 5 1 0 2 1 31 4-10 .400 1-1 1.000 1-1 1.000
Celtics 121   Jim Paxson 12 3 1 0 0 0 2 23 5-9 .556 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
1988 Playoffs - Eastern Conference Finals
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
May. 25, 1988
7. Pistons 104   Joe Dumars 10 0 5 0 0 1 1 31 3-8 .375 0-0 - 4-4 1.000
Celtics 96   Jim Paxson 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 11 1-3 .333 0-0 - 0-0 -
May. 26, 1988
8. Pistons 115   Joe Dumars 9 1 10 0 0 4 4 43 4-11 .364 0-0 - 1-2 .500
2OT Celtics 119   Jim Paxson 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 20 3-7 .429 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
May. 28, 1988
9. Pistons 98   Joe Dumars 29 1 3 2 0 0 1 38 12-21 .571 1-2 .500 4-4 1.000
Celtics 94   Jim Paxson 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 16 1-8 .125 0-0 - 0-0 -
May. 30, 1988
10. Pistons 78   Joe Dumars 4 2 5 0 0 5 4 39 1-10 .100 0-1 .000 2-2 1.000
Celtics 79   Jim Paxson 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 11 0-3 .000 0-0 - 0-0 -
Jun. 01, 1988
11. Pistons 102   Joe Dumars 18 4 5 0 1 3 3 50 8-14 .571 0-1 .000 2-4 .500
OT Celtics 96   Jim Paxson 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 08 0-1 .000 0-1 .000 0-0 -
Jun. 03, 1988
12. Pistons 95   Joe Dumars 8 4 3 1 0 2 2 33 3-8 .375 0-0 - 2-2 1.000
Celtics 90   Jim Paxson 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 0-3 .000 0-0 - 0-0 -
1988-89 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 11, 1988
13. Pistons 116   Joe Dumars 24 2 7 2 0 1 2 38 10-14 .714 0-0 - 4-5 .800
Celtics 107   Jim Paxson 7 3 4 1 0 0 5 18 3-5 .600 0-0 - 1-1 1.000
1989-90 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 18, 1989
14. Pistons 103   Joe Dumars 27 3 7 2 0 1 3 37 10-14 .714 0-0 - 7-9 .778
Celtics 86   Jim Paxson 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 07 1-3 .333 0-0 - 0-0 -
Jan. 10, 1990
15. Pistons 97   Joe Dumars 13 2 5 0 0 0 1 38 5-13 .385 0-0 - 3-3 1.000
Celtics 104   Jim Paxson 4 3 6 1 0 2 1 33 2-7 .286 0-0 - 0-0 -
Share: