Head-to-Head: Games Played Between Jordan Farmar and Rasheed Wallace

This is the detail of NBA games in which Jordan Farmar and Rasheed Wallace played against each other, including head-to-head record, stats average, game highs and game-by-game data both in the Regular Season and Playoffs.

Player comparisons:
Career comparison / Games against each other

They faced each other a total of 14 times in NBA games. Rasheed Wallace has an 8-6 winning record over Jordan Farmar, but Jordan Farmar won more matchups in the Playoffs for a 4-3 postseason record.

Games Played Against Each Other

Jordan Farmar
vs.
Rasheed Wallace
NBA Timeline:
1946-47
2025-26
Jordan Farmar:
2006-07 to 2016-17
Rasheed Wallace:
1995-96 to 2012-13
14 Games played
7 in Regular Season
7 in Playoffs

Summary of Victories

 Games Won in
Regular Season		 in
Playoffs
Jordan Farmar
6
2
4
Rasheed Wallace
8
5
3

Stats in Games Between Them

Averages
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Jordan Farmar 5.2 1.5 1.4 1.00.0
Rasheed Wallace 8.6 5.6 0.90.91.3
Game Highs
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Jordan Farmar 10 5 5 40
Rasheed Wallace 25 13 4 34
Games with better stats than the other player...
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Jordan Farmar 3

games		 0

games		 9

games		 6

games		0

games
Rasheed Wallace 8

games 		13

games		 3

games		 4

games		9

games
Both had same stat 3

games		 1

game		 2

games		 4

games		5

games

Head To Head Games Played: One by One

more >>
2006-07 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 10, 2006
1. Lakers 83   Jordan Farmar 9 1 5 0 0 0 1 22 4-8 .500 1-3 .333 0-0 -
Pistons 97   Rasheed Wallace 15 7 1 0 2 0 5 33 6-12 .500 2-4 .500 1-1 1.000
Feb. 08, 2007
2. Lakers 78   Jordan Farmar 10 5 3 0 0 1 2 23 4-7 .571 2-4 .500 0-0 -
Pistons 93   Rasheed Wallace 18 10 2 3 3 2 2 37 7-13 .538 3-3 1.000 1-1 1.000
2007-08 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 16, 2007
3. Lakers 103   Jordan Farmar 10 4 3 4 0 0 0 24 3-10 .300 2-4 .500 2-4 .500
Pistons 91   Rasheed Wallace 13 8 0 1 0 3 3 32 5-14 .357 1-4 .250 2-2 1.000
Jan. 31, 2008
4. Lakers 89   Jordan Farmar 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 17 2-5 .400 0-2 .000 0-0 -
Pistons 90   Rasheed Wallace 6 4 0 3 4 2 5 30 3-13 .231 0-4 .000 0-0 -
2008-09 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 14, 2008
5. Lakers 95   Jordan Farmar 6 1 1 0 0 1 3 14 3-7 .429 0-2 .000 0-0 -
Pistons 106   Rasheed Wallace 25 13 0 0 2 1 2 39 8-15 .533 4-9 .444 5-6 .833
2009-10 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Jan. 31, 2010
6. Lakers 90   Jordan Farmar 8 0 1 1 0 1 1 14 4-4 1.000 0-0 - 0-0 -
Celtics 89   Rasheed Wallace 3 1 4 2 0 0 4 21 1-3 .333 1-3 .333 0-0 -
Feb. 18, 2010
7. Lakers 86   Jordan Farmar 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 23 2-7 .286 1-5 .200 0-2 .000
Celtics 87   Rasheed Wallace 4 3 0 0 2 1 1 20 2-11 .182 0-3 .000 0-1 .000
2010 Playoffs - NBA Finals
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Jun. 03, 2010
8. Lakers 102   Jordan Farmar 4 2 1 1 0 1 1 13 2-4 .500 0-0 - 0-0 -
Celtics 89   Rasheed Wallace 9 4 0 0 1 1 3 18 3-4 .750 1-2 .500 2-2 1.000
Jun. 06, 2010
9. Lakers 94   Jordan Farmar 7 0 1 1 0 2 1 13 3-7 .429 1-4 .250 0-0 -
Celtics 103   Rasheed Wallace 7 7 1 0 0 1 4 18 3-5 .600 1-3 .333 0-0 -
Jun. 08, 2010
10. Lakers 91   Jordan Farmar 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 07 1-2 .500 0-1 .000 0-0 -
Celtics 84   Rasheed Wallace 2 4 3 2 1 0 4 19 1-5 .200 0-3 .000 0-0 -
Jun. 10, 2010
11. Lakers 89   Jordan Farmar 3 2 1 2 0 1 1 11 1-2 .500 1-2 .500 0-0 -
Celtics 96   Rasheed Wallace 3 2 0 1 0 1 5 22 1-5 .200 1-1 1.000 0-0 -
Jun. 13, 2010
12. Lakers 86   Jordan Farmar 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 14 0-4 .000 0-1 .000 1-2 .500
Celtics 92   Rasheed Wallace 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 15 2-4 .500 1-2 .500 0-0 -
Jun. 15, 2010
13. Lakers 89   Jordan Farmar 4 1 1 3 0 2 0 17 2-6 .333 0-1 .000 0-0 -
Celtics 67   Rasheed Wallace 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 17 0-7 .000 0-6 .000 0-0 -
Jun. 17, 2010
14. Lakers 83   Jordan Farmar 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 13 0-3 .000 0-1 .000 0-0 -
Celtics 79   Rasheed Wallace 11 8 2 0 2 0 6 36 5-11 .455 1-4 .250 0-0 -
Share: