Chet Holmgren vs. James Scott Season by Season Comparison
Side by side comparison of each NBA season of James Scott and Chet Holmgren, from their rookie seasons to their last year played, in chronological order with awards, stats, championships and playoff performance of their teams every year.
Who had the better rookie season? Who had best stats in their 10th season? Who won a championship first? These questions and many others, are answered here.
Chet Holmgren and James Scott both played 1 year in the NBA. Chet Holmgren had his first NBA Season in 2023-24, while James Scott had his rookie season in 1996-97. With that starting point, here you can take a look at each of their seasons side by side and compare how their careers evolved in achivements, awards and championships won, the stats they recorded both in the Regular Season and the Playoffs and how their teams performed in the postseason.
Their Careers | |||
Player | Total Seasons | Playoffs Played | NBA Years |
Chet Holmgren | 1 | 1 | 2023-24 |
James Scott | 1 | 0 | 1996-97 |
Comparison Season by Season |
||
Rookie Season |
||
Chet Holmgren | James Scott | |
Season | 2023-24 | 1996-97 |
Team | Oklahoma City Thunder | Miami Heat |
Honors & Awards | All-Rookie First Team | - |
Playoffs | Thunder Lost West Conf Semis | Did Not Play |
more >>
Regular Season Stats | ||||||||||||||||||||
G | Min | Pts | ORb | DRb | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FGM / A | % | 3PM / A | % | FTM / A | % | ||||
Chet Holmgren | 82 | 29.4 | 16.5 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 11.6 | .530 | 1.6 | 4.3 | .370 | 2.7 | 3.4 | .793 |
James Scott | 8 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.5 | .000 | 0.1 | 0.3 | .500 |
Playoffs Stats | ||||||||||||||||||||
G | Min | Pts | ORb | DRb | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FGM / A | % | 3PM / A | % | FTM / A | % | ||||
Chet Holmgren | 10 | 34.5 | 15.6 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 7.2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 5.9 | 11.9 | .496 | 1.3 | 5.0 | .260 | 2.5 | 3.3 | .758 |
James Scott | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |