Horace Grant vs. Steve Kerr: Bulls Rankings Comparison

Explore Steve Kerr and Horace Grant career statistics with the Chicago Bulls and discover their all-time rankings in franchise history for both the regular season and the playoffs. See their standing side-by-side in key categories for both total numbers and per game averages, encompassing all games played with the team. Who ranks higher in franchise lore?

While the rankings of their overall NBA careers provide a broader context, here we zoom in on how Horace Grant and Steve Kerr truly stack up based solely on their time with the Chicago Bulls. This in-depth analysis goes beyond basic career numbers to provide a unique look at where they stand among the franchise's all-time greats.

Considering Horace Grant's 7 seasons (1988 to 1994) and Steve Kerr's 5 seasons (1994 to 1998) played specifically for the team, delve into a precise breakdown of their standing across every key statistical category—from scoring, rebounding, and assists to steals, blocks, triple-doubles, and specific points thresholds—encompassing both regular season and their complete playoff runs with the franchise. Our detailed tables provide side-by-side rankings and comparative values, offering the definitive data needed to assess their historical impact on the franchise.

First, review a concise summary of how they rank in Bulls history in the main categories (points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks) for both total and per-game stats, and below, you can then explore in detail all their franchise stats and their historical rankings within the team's record books.

Note: per game rankings include players with a minimum of games played

Note: the per game rankings on this page are among players with a minimum of 40 games played with the Bulls franchise for season stats, and 3 games for Playoff stats.