Chet Holmgren vs. Julius Randle: NBA Rankings Comparison

The ultimate statistical showdown: compare Chet Holmgren and Julius Randle all-time NBA rankings. Explore their historical standing across total and per-game stats, regular season and playoffs. Who ranks higher?

Player comparisons:
Career comparison / Season by season / Scoring / Stats / Stats Rankings / Games against each other

This in-depth analysis goes beyond basic career numbers to provide an unparalleled look at where Chet Holmgren, with a career spanning 2 seasons from 2024 to 2025, and Julius Randle, with 11 seasons played from 2015 to 2025, stand among the league's historical elite..

Dive into a meticulous breakdown of their positions in every major statistical category—from scoring and rebounding to assists, steals, and blocks—across both regular season and their entire playoff careers. Our comprehensive tables offer side-by-side rankings, value comparisons, and key differences, ensuring you have all the definitive data to assess their historical impact.

First, review a concise summary of how they rank in NBA history in the main categories (points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks) for both total and per-game stats, and below, you can then explore in detail all their stats and their historical rankings.

Chet Holmgren vs. Julius Randle
Total Stats, Rankings Summary

Career Totals
Season Playoffs
Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Chet Holmgren Julius Randle
Points
+300th
214th
+300th
+300th
Rebounds
+300th
160th
+300th
+300th
Assists
+300th
294th
+300th
+300th
Steals
+300th
+300th
+300th
+300th
Blocks
+300th
+300th
134th
+300th
Years21123

Chet Holmgren vs. Julius Randle
Per Game Stats, Rankings Summary

Career Per Game
Season Playoffs
Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Chet Holmgren Julius Randle
Points
--
96th
234th
107th
Rebounds
--
93rd
132nd
167th
Assists
--
257th
+300th
154th
Steals
--
+300th
+300th
+300th
Blocks
--
+300th
18th
+300th

Note: the season per game rankings on this page respect the minimums usually applied by the NBA for all-time leaders: 400 games with some exceptions for some stats; for the Playoffs a minimum of 3 games is used.

Comparisons on this page:

Their rankings for:
Season Totals - Playoffs Totals /
Season Per Game - Playoffs Per Game

Career Totals,
Regular Season Rankings

Stats Rankings:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Points
+300th
214th
+86 1,836 vs. 13,51711,681
Rebounds
+300th
160th
+140 905 vs. 6,4915,586
Assists
+300th
294th
+6 263 vs. 2,7102,447
Steals
+300th
+300th
76 vs. 486410
Blocks
+300th
+300th
261 vs. 28423
Offensive Rebounds
+300th
260th
+40 177 vs. 1,4091,232
Defensive Rebounds
+300th
89th
+211 728 vs. 5,0824,354
Field Goals Made
+300th
238th
+62 672 vs. 4,8964,224
Field Goals Attempted
+300th
261st
+39 1,294 vs. 10,3849,090
3-Pointers Made
+300th
238th
+62 173 vs. 850677
3-Pointers Attempted
+300th
201st
+99 465 vs. 2,5432,078
Free Throws Made
+300th
192nd
+108 319 vs. 2,8752,556
Free Throws Attempted
+300th
178th
+122 409 vs. 3,8163,407

Games and Years:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Games Played
+300th
+300th
114 vs. 710596
Seasons
+300th
+300th
2 vs. 119

Rankings by Points Scored:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
40+ point games
-
93rd
0 vs. 1111
50+ point games
-
76th
0 vs. 11
60+ point games
-
-
0 vs. 00

Career Totals,
Playoffs Rankings

Stats Rankings:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Points
+300th
+300th
505 vs. 58277
Rebounds
+300th
+300th
271 vs. 22942
Assists
+300th
+300th
43 vs. 13087
Steals
+300th
+300th
24 vs. 204
Blocks
134th
+300th
+166 68 vs. 563
Offensive Rebounds
+300th
+300th
56 vs. 551
Defensive Rebounds
296th
+300th
+4 215 vs. 17441
Field Goals Made
+300th
+300th
182 vs. 19816
Field Goals Attempted
+300th
+300th
385 vs. 47085
3-Pointers Made
+300th
238th
+62 40 vs. 5818
3-Pointers Attempted
284th
225th
59 141 vs. 17736
Free Throws Made
+300th
+300th
101 vs. 12827
Free Throws Attempted
+300th
+300th
130 vs. 15727

Games and Years:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Games Played
+300th
+300th
33 vs. 303
Playoffs
+300th
+300th
2 vs. 31

Rankings by Points Scored:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
40+ point games
-
-
0 vs. 00

Career Per Game Averages,
Regular Season Rankings

Stats Rankings:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Points per game
--
96th
16.11 vs. 19.042.93
Rebounds per game
--
93rd
7.94 vs. 9.141.20
Assists per game
--
257th
2.31 vs. 3.821.51
Steals per game
--
+300th
0.67 vs. 0.680.02
Blocks per game
--
+300th
2.29 vs. 0.401.89
Offensive Rebounds per game
--
218th
1.55 vs. 1.980.43
Defensive Rebounds per game
--
34th
6.39 vs. 7.160.77
Field Goals Made per game
--
128th
5.89 vs. 6.901.00
Field Goals Attempted per game
--
138th
11.35 vs. 14.633.27
3-Pointers Made per game
--
+300th
1.52 vs. 1.200.32
3-Pointers Attempted per game
--
186th
4.08 vs. 3.580.50
Free Throws Made per game
--
123rd
2.80 vs. 4.051.25
Free Throws Attempted per game
--
108th
3.59 vs. 5.371.79

Career Per Game Averages,
Playoffs Rankings

Stats Rankings:

Chet Holmgren Julius Randle Rk Diff. Values Diff.
Points per game
234th
107th
127 15.30 vs. 19.404.10
Rebounds per game
132nd
167th
35 8.21 vs. 7.630.58
Assists per game
+300th
154th
+146 1.30 vs. 4.333.03
Steals per game
+300th
+300th
0.73 vs. 0.670.06
Blocks per game
18th
+300th
+282 2.06 vs. 0.171.89
Offensive Rebounds per game
+300th
269th
+31 1.70 vs. 1.830.14
Defensive Rebounds per game
65th
102nd
37 6.52 vs. 5.800.72
Field Goals Made per game
259th
155th
104 5.52 vs. 6.601.08
Field Goals Attempted per game
+300th
119th
+181 11.67 vs. 15.674.00
3-Pointers Made per game
238th
66th
172 1.21 vs. 1.930.72
3-Pointers Attempted per game
141st
45th
96 4.27 vs. 5.901.63
Free Throws Made per game
+300th
140th
+160 3.06 vs. 4.271.21
Free Throws Attempted per game
+300th
161st
+139 3.94 vs. 5.231.29

Note: Even if they don't have the minimum of 400 season games, the players are also included in the all-time rankings in some stats if they reach certain thresholds: 10,000 points; 4,000 rebounds; 2,000 assists; 625 steals; 500 blocks; 250 3-pointers made.